What I do love is that currently the biggest destruction** Global Warming has caused is the careers of 2 Australian prime ministers. One who announced his action plan against climate change and was promptly backstabbed from his own party and the second who currently has taken an 11 point beating in the polls and if she doesn't recover it quickly could face the same fate as her predecessor (although unlikely it sure would be fun!)
For an avid liberal it's great fun watching the Labor party squirm but thats not what I want to discuss.
Opinion Polls - What I really don't understand with these huge swings in polls is that either some people are just really indecisive and change their mind at the slightest new legislation or there's something wrong with the way we poll people. Now sure over a controversial piece of legislation some people might choose to vote for the opposing party if they disagree, but 11%?!? Lets say that a mere 66% of the public are voting adults then this 11% swing would correspond to 2 million people. How could that many people change their minds over just a framework of a carbon tax, it hasn't even been debated on the house's floor yet! Lets see where thing is going people!
How do we poll people anyway? Do we call maybe a couple of thousand people, ask them how they vote and tally it up against last months results? So say the pollers choose by chance a really pro-liberal group, could that cause a huge swing towards the liberals or do they have guards against that? Does anyone really take polls seriously when being polled?!? If we took two polls at the exact same time could we get two completely different results? Hopefully not, but maybe it's worth looking in to...
Anyway hopefully someone has the answer and I can sleep better at night.
See you next time, and don't forget to leave me a comment!
Petey
*N.B - In no way am against global warming being real, in fact I think it is a huge threat to the planet and we really should do something about it, and it may well have had already caused bigger destructions than peoples careers but it's not as evident yet.
It will probably take us a decade or two to collect enough data to say with some confidence that Hurricane Katrina, Cyclone Yasi and the Queensland floods were exacerbated by climate change. By then it will be too late (if it isn't already).
ReplyDeleteThis however is irrelevant to the current debate because the debate is devoid of facts. The real problem the government has is that it is getting hit by right wing nut jobs with crazy conspiracy theories. Usually these types are silenced by the Liberal party machine, but these days they are harnessed - all in the name of winning one measly election. Meanwhile civil discourse and genuine debate (that is, arguing with facts) dies and along with it democracy.
This is what we have from the Liberal Party and its newsletter The Australian:
NBN - made up stories
Carbon price - lies
Libya policy - lies
Water policy - lies
Refugees - lies
The Liberal party of Menzies is dead. Now we have a strange amalgam of the home-baked One Nation party and the US-born Tea Party. This is not your father's Liberal party, it's neo-fascism - the very type we fought against in WWII.
Hi Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteI agree that the debate is devoid of facts but one think I do know is that Labour didn't keep their promise. This clip (although produced by Liberal) I think sums up the Labour parties position: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMVc0IbtyAQ at least it did before the election...
On elections and polls I do wonder if Julia is worried about being replace by someone in the party who is more popular, after all Kevin Rudd was removed because his ratings was low (although to be fair it wasn't as low as Julia's). Currently it seems that the most popular person in the Labour party is... Kevin Rudd... how does that even happen? I think I would vote for Rudd if given the chance again...